Poltergeist Review (2015) – Comparison to Original

 

The realm of cinematic remakes is often met with a mix of anticipation and skepticism, particularly when it involves reimagining a classic. The 2015 remake of the iconic 1982 horror film “Poltergeist” is a prime example of this phenomenon. Directed by Gil Kenan, the modern retelling aimed to capture the essence of the original while infusing contemporary elements that resonate with today’s audience.

The original “Poltergeist,” directed by Tobe Hooper and produced by Steven Spielberg, was a groundbreaking film for its time. It masterfully blended family drama with supernatural horror, creating an atmosphere that was as emotionally engaging as it was terrifying. The story of the Freeling family, whose suburban home is invaded by malevolent spirits, struck a chord with viewers and remains a staple in the horror genre.

Fast forward to 2015, and we have a film that attempts to stand on the shoulders of its predecessor. The remake follows a similar plotline, where the Bowen family moves into a new home only to find themselves terrorized by ghostly entities. The central narrative remains intact, with the youngest daughter, Madison, being abducted into the spirit realm, prompting the family to seek help from paranormal experts.

One of the most notable differences between the two films is the pacing. Critics have pointed out that the remake moves at a brisker pace, shaving off about 20 minutes from the original runtime. This expedited storytelling leads to less character development, which some argue leaves the remake feeling hollow compared to the original’s rich narrative tapestry.

The use of CGI in the 2015 version has also been a point of contention. Modern technology allowed for more visually striking spectral apparitions, but many fans and critics feel that the original’s practical effects lent a more convincing and tangible sense of horror. The tactile nature of the 1982 film’s effects, such as the infamous clown doll and the skeletal remains in the swimming pool, had a visceral impact that the remake’s digital ghosts struggle to match.

Another aspect where the remake diverges is in its reflection of contemporary fears. The original “Poltergeist” tapped into the anxieties of the early ’80s, with the television set—a symbol of technological intrusion—serving as the portal for the supernatural forces. The 2015 film updates this concept, incorporating modern devices like smartphones and drones into the narrative. However, some reviews suggest that these elements were not as effectively integrated into the storyline or the thematic undercurrents of the film.

Despite these criticisms, the remake does have its merits. Sam Rockwell and Rosemarie DeWitt deliver commendable performances as the beleaguered parents, and there are moments where the film successfully captures the harrowing intensity of a family in crisis. The central horror set piece, where the children are attacked, is a highlight that pays homage to the original while delivering its own thrills.

In conclusion, while the 2015 “Poltergeist” remake brings a few new tricks to the table, it ultimately falls short of the high bar set by the 1982 original. The remake serves as a competent horror film for those unfamiliar with the original, but for fans of the classic, it lacks the depth and innovation that made the Freeling family’s ordeal so compelling. The spectral shift from practical to digital, from slow-burn terror to rapid-fire scares, reflects the changing landscape of horror cinema but also underscores the enduring legacy of the original “Poltergeist” as a film that truly haunts our collective imagination.

In the Nutshell

In conclusion, while the 2015 “Poltergeist” remake brings a few new tricks to the table, it ultimately falls short of the high bar set by the 1982 original. The remake serves as a competent horror film for those unfamiliar with the original, but for fans of the classic, it lacks the depth and innovation that made the Freeling family’s ordeal so compelling. The spectral shift from practical to digital, from slow-burn terror to rapid-fire scares, reflects the changing landscape of horror cinema but also underscores the enduring legacy of the original “Poltergeist” as a film that truly haunts our collective imagination. I give 1 out of 5 stars.

If you already saw this movie, help us rate the movie by click on the Star Rating.

Profile

Genre: Paranormal

You can watch on: 

Trailer

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.